Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, highly actionable three-phase workflow with explicit gating between stages and copy-paste-ready commands and phrasings. Its main defect is that its single bundle reference, HTML-REPORT.md, is missing from the bundle, breaking both the promised navigation and the concrete report-building material. Its only other weakness is the absence of validation checkpoints for the report-write/open step.
Suggestions
Add the missing HTML-REPORT.md to the bundle (containing the HTML scaffold, diagram patterns, and styling guidance) so the referenced path resolves and the report step has concrete material
Add a validation checkpoint after writing the temp HTML file — e.g. confirm the file exists and is non-empty before opening it, with a fallback if the open command fails
Tighten the Explore phase with a brief checklist of what the sub-agent must return (candidate list with files/problem/evidence) so the report phase has a deterministic input contract
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line is directive with at most one short sentence of rationale ("深化 module 的收益在于让未来修改更容易"); the body assumes Claude knows git, temp dirs, Tailwind, and Mermaid and explains none of them. No padding or concept explanations are present, matching the lean anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete throughout — `git log --oneline`, $TMPDIR with /tmp and %TEMP% fallbacks, the exact output path `<tmpdir>/architecture-review-<timestamp>.html`, per-OS open commands, exact user-facing quotes, and enumerated card fields. It falls short of 5 because the promised HTML scaffold and diagram patterns are delegated to HTML-REPORT.md, which is not in the bundle, leaving the report-building step without its concrete material. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three phases (Explore → Present report → Grilling loop) are clearly sequenced with explicit gates ("写完文件后问用户", "用户选中 candidate 后", "现在不要提出 interfaces"). Not 5 because there are no validation steps for the temp-file write or for confirming the report opened successfully, and no error-recovery loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body itself is well-sectioned and points one level deep to a clearly signaled [HTML-REPORT.md](HTML-REPORT.md), but that file does not exist in the bundle — the only referenced path is broken. Scoring against the actual bundle structure, the navigation promise fails, which sits between the broken/inline structure of 2 and the minor-gap organization of 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |