Conciseness

Mostly lean and actionable with no padding about concepts Claude already knows; the worked example and lint-rules summary could be trimmed slightly but earn their place.

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready commands (mkdir -p, pnpm ai-hero-cli internal lint, git mv, git commit), a concrete readme stub template, and a full plan-to-scaffold example covering common cases.

Workflow Clarity

A clear 5-step sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint (run lint) and a feedback loop (fix errors, iterate until lint passes), satisfying the validation requirement for this batch operation.

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized with clear section headers and all content self-contained; the lint-rules summary and full worked example are reasonable inline but slightly bulk the overview, so it stops short of a 5.

Specificity

Names the domain ('exercise directory structures' with sections/problems/answers/explanations) and the concrete action of passing linting, but lists only 1-2 actions rather than a comprehensive set.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (create exercise directory structures that pass linting) and 'when' (适用于用户想 scaffold exercises / 创建 exercise stubs / 设置新的课程章节) with concrete trigger phrases.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural trigger phrases users would say ('scaffold exercises', '创建 exercise stubs', '设置新的课程章节'); a few synonyms or natural variations are missing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a specific niche (course exercise scaffolding with lint enforcement) with distinct triggers; minor overlap risk with generic scaffolding skills.