to-questionnaire

把你无法完整回答的 decision 转成一份交给他人填写的 questionnaire。

Quality

69%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/productivity/to-questionnaire/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is an efficient, well-structured instruction skill with explicit per-step completion checkpoints and a copy-paste template, scoring strongly on workflow clarity and progressive disclosure. Minor conciseness and actionability trims are the only room for improvement.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and assumes competence, delivering a memorable principle ('Grill the send, not the subject'), a 3-step process, and a tight template with only minor prose that could be trimmed, fitting 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation'.	4 / 5
Actionability	It provides concrete, executable guidance—a copy-paste questionnaire template, an explicit output path 'to-questionnaire-<slug>.md', and per-step questions to ask—with only minor gaps, matching 'mostly executable guidance'.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The three steps are clearly sequenced and each ends with an explicit completion checkpoint ('当...时，这一步完成' / '当文件存在，且...每项内容都有问题覆盖时完成'), giving clear validation gates and a feedback-style completion loop.	5 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	A self-contained skill under 50 lines with no external references needed, organized into clear numbered steps plus a 'Document structure' section with a well-signaled template; per the simple-skill note this earns a 5.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description states a concrete purpose in a distinct niche but lacks an explicit 'Use when' trigger clause and only names a single action, capping completeness and specificity at the midpoint. Adding explicit trigger phrasing and a second concrete action would raise it.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when ...' clause naming the situations that should trigger this skill (e.g. blocked on a decision someone else has context for).

List a second concrete action or output variant to broaden capability coverage beyond a single questionnaire action.

Include a natural-language synonym (e.g. 'questionnaire / 问卷 / decision intake form') to improve trigger-term coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain (unanswerable decisions) and one concrete action ('转成一份交给他人填写的 questionnaire'), but stops at a single action without broader coverage, matching the 1-2 concrete actions anchor.	3 / 5
Completeness	It gives a clear 'what' (turn an unanswerable decision into a questionnaire for someone else) but has no explicit 'Use when...' clause; the 'when' is only weakly implied by '你无法完整回答的 decision', which per the guidelines caps completeness at 3.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes relevant terms like 'decision' and 'questionnaire' plus the natural phrasing '无法完整回答', but misses common synonyms or variations a user might say, fitting the 'some relevant keywords' anchor.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The niche is clear and fairly distinct (converting stuck decisions into outbound questionnaires) with minimal overlap risk against other skills, though it is not maximally differentiated.	4 / 5
	Total	13 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN
Path: skills/productivity/to-questionnaire/SKILL.md
Commit: 9fe7e7a

Reviewed: 6 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.