The body is lean: it states a guiding principle ('Grill the send, not the subject'), three sequenced steps with completion criteria, and a compact template, without explaining concepts Claude already knows or padding — every section earns its place.

Guidance is concrete and executable: a specific output path ('to-questionnaire-<slug>.md'), a full document template with section roles, an example question with a _why this matters_ line, and answer stubs — fully actionable for an instruction-only skill.

The three steps are explicitly sequenced and each has a stated completion criterion, with step 3 verifying both that the file exists and that every item from step 2 is covered by a question — an explicit validation checkpoint with no destructive/batch gap.

This is a simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references; its sections (numbered steps, Document structure) are well-organized, meeting the simple-skills allowance for a top score.

Quotes 'decision 转成一份交给他人填写的 questionnaire' name the domain (unanswerable decisions) and a single concrete action (convert into a questionnaire), but do not list multiple specific actions, matching the 'names domain and some actions' anchor rather than the 'lists multiple' anchor above.

It states what the skill does (turn unanswerable decisions into a questionnaire) but provides only an implied 'when' (when you cannot fully answer a decision) with no explicit 'Use when…' clause, which per the guidelines caps completeness at 2.

Contains relevant keywords like 'decision' and 'questionnaire' a user might say, but offers no explicit trigger phrasing or common variations, fitting 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations'; it is not jargon-only (level 1) nor full coverage (level 3).

Producing a questionnaire to hand to another person for a decision the user cannot answer is a clear, distinctive niche unlikely to trigger competing skills, matching the 'clear niche with distinct triggers' anchor.