Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured orchestration skill: both invocation modes are precisely sequenced with concrete templates, labels, claim/blocking protocols, and explicit stop conditions. Its main weakness is token efficiency — a layer of conceptual narration and justification could be trimmed — and a few operational details (tracker fallback, resolution-comment content) are deferred without being pinned down.
Suggestions
Trim the justificatory musing (e.g. the "Plan, don't do" and fog-of-war framing sentences) to bare rules; keep the rules, drop the philosophy.
Add one or two concrete lines specifying what a resolution comment must contain (answer, evidence/links, facts downstream tickets depend on), since the work-through flow depends on it.
Add a brief validation step after wiring blocking edges (e.g. re-run the frontier query and confirm each blocked ticket shows its blocker), closing the one remaining workflow gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient, skill-specific rules, but recurring conceptual musing — "Wayfinding 的目标是找到这条路，而不是朝 destination 猛冲", "想直接做工作的冲动通常表示你已经到达 map 边缘", "Out-of-scope work 永远不会 graduate；frontier 会停在 destination" — justifies rules rather than stating them and could be tightened without losing clarity. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: numbered steps with exact sub-skill invocations ("调用两次 Skill 工具，分别指定 `grilling` 和 `domain-modeling`"), ready-to-use map and ticket body templates, specific labels (`wayfinder:map`, `wayfinder:<type>`), and a precise claim protocol ("在任何工作开始前先 assign"). Minor gaps: the local-markdown tracker fallback and the expected content of a resolution comment are left unspecified. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Both invocation modes are clearly sequenced with numbered steps and several explicit checkpoints ("如果没有 fog…停止并询问用户如何继续", "停止。Charting 是一个 session 的工作", "每个 session 绝不要 resolve 超过一个 ticket") plus feedback handling ("如果这个 decision 使 map 其他部分失效，更新或删除那些 tickets"). Not 5 because there is no validate/retry loop on tracker edits, e.g. confirming blocking edges wired correctly after the second pass. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so everything lives in a single well-sectioned SKILL.md (Map, Ticket Types, Fog of war, Out of scope, Invocation) with templates placed at point of use and one clearly signaled external pointer ("查阅 tracker doc 的 'Wayfinding operations' section"). Good structure with no nested references; the only gap is that all detail is inlined in a ~123-line file, though nothing here demands a split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |