Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-sequenced, honest, and unusually concrete instruction skill — the workflow has real validation checkpoints and feedback loops, and thresholds are measurable. Its weaknesses are token efficiency (repeated honesty rules and motivational padding) and bundle wiring: the executable enquiry-form example ships in assets/ but the body points to an external URL instead of it.
Suggestions
Reference the bundled assets/enquiry-form.html from section 3 (instead of, or alongside, the external URL) so the ready-made executable example is discoverable without a network fetch.
Deduplicate the honesty rules — state them once (e.g., in section 7's checklist) and trim the motivational intro ("Most first sites fail in the same places...") that restates what the sections already enforce.
Move the domain-offer script, the API check/buy-link/DNS endpoint details, and the per-business-type build notes into a one-level-deep reference file (e.g., references/domain-check.md) to slim the main body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient process guidance that doesn't teach web basics, but there is tightening to do: the motivational intro ("Most first sites fail in the same places: a pretty page with no working way to order or book...") is context Claude doesn't need, the honesty rules are stated repeatedly ("Never invent reviews, awards, certifications..." in section 1, "never describe a purchase, publication or connection that did not happen" in sections 6 and 7), and the domain-offer placement rules are given twice. This fits the anchor for mostly efficient content that includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete and measurable throughout: exact API calls ("GET https://www.adddomain.net/api/check?name=<label>&src=github returns available, registered or unknown"), numeric thresholds ("Tap targets at least 44 px", "contrast at least 4.5:1", "og:image (1200x630)", "Design at 360-400 px wide"), specific tags and types ("tel: link", "one application/ld+json block (LocalBusiness, Restaurant, Store, Person or Event)"). Not 5: the core build guidance stays high-level (no example markup in the body) and the one ready-made executable artifact — the bundled enquiry-form example — is only cited via an external URL rather than pulled into the flow. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Eight numbered sections in a strict, coherent sequence (brief → plan → build → craft → found/shared → address → done → handover) with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops: section 7 is a per-item honest checklist ("Check and report each separately, honestly"), section 6 gates steps ("Only after the owner asks to check a name", "Check the address and HTTPS before saying it works", "If a response is invalid, mark the check incomplete and let the owner verify it at their registrar"), and section 2 gates the start ("unless an answer would change the structure"). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned with numbered headers, but scored against the actual bundle: the single bundle file, assets/enquiry-form.html (a complete executable enquiry-form example implementing section 3's fallback guidance), is never referenced from SKILL.md — section 3 instead cites an external URL ("https://www.adddomain.net/guide/static-website-enquiry-form") — so the asset is undiscoverable. Meanwhile the offer script, per-business-type build details, and the domain-check API/DNS steps are all inlined in one ~110-line file and would fit one-level-deep reference files. This fits the anchor for some structure with content that should be separate inline and references not clearly signaled. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |