Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, table-driven reference that assumes Claude's competence and provides concrete decision matrices plus clear routing examples; it lacks executable code and explicit validation checkpoints but neither is strictly required for this orchestrator-style skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is table-driven and dense, assuming Claude knows terms like ECS, AABB, quadtree, and GOAP; only light explanatory prose ('Every game... follows this pattern') keeps it from a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete decision matrices (pattern selection, AI by complexity, collision strategy) and explicit routing examples give actionable guidance; the code blocks are conceptual diagrams rather than executable code, but as an instruction-only orchestrator that is acceptable with minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Routing Examples 1-3 lay out a clear sequenced workflow (start with platform sub-skill, then dimension, then specialty), and no destructive/batch operations are present so the validation cap does not apply; only minor explicit-checkpoint gaps remain. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and routing to one-level-deep sub-skills is clearly signaled; no bundle files exist to verify, and the self-contained content is appropriately structured with only minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |