Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured single-purpose skill with concrete examples and an explicit verification step. Adding an explicit fix-and-re-verify feedback loop and the actual Bikeshed build command would round it out.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop after the verify step: 'If any anchor fails to resolve, add the missing explicit id and rebuild.'
Include the concrete Bikeshed build command in step 4 so verification is copy-paste executable.
State the prerequisite or starting state (e.g., spec source format, Bikeshed installed) so Claude knows where the workflow begins.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence, with prose limited to genuine Bikeshed-specific knowledge (auto-generated IDs, cross-spec link breakage) rather than basics; only minor explanatory passages could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready BAD/GOOD HTML examples, a concrete ID-pattern table, and a checklist naming specific tools (xref, grep the spec URL); minor gaps keep it from a 5, e.g., no explicit Bikeshed build command. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step checklist with an explicit verification checkpoint (step 4: build and confirm anchors resolve), but the feedback loop — what to do when anchors fail to resolve — is only implicit rather than spelled out. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, self-contained with no need for external bundle files (none exist), and well-organized into Problem/Fix/ID-patterns/Checklist sections — meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |