CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

novel-memory

小说记忆系统 - 基于工作区文件的持久化记忆,管理角色设定、章节摘要、伏笔追踪等。关键词:记忆、存储、查询、设定、知识管理。

58

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/novel-memory/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is concise, well-structured, and gives a clear file model with one concrete template, but the workflows stop at prose-level instructions without executable commands or validation/verification checkpoints for batch state updates. Adding copy-paste commands and an explicit consistency-check feedback loop would raise actionability and workflow clarity.

Suggestions

Provide concrete executable steps for the read/write phases, e.g. `grep -r '关键词' '设定/'` and a one-line example of appending to 设定/characters.md, instead of prose-only instructions.

Add an explicit validation/checkpoint step after writes — e.g. after updating foreshadowing, verify each '未回收' entry still has a matching chapter and re-check cross-file consistency (query flow already sketches this) — so batch operations have a feedback loop.

Optionally clarify the 'append vs overwrite' rule with a tiny before/after example in characters.md to make the append-first principle unambiguous and copy-paste ready.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean and well-organized with tables and short lists that each earn their place; it does not explain concepts Claude already knows and keeps the file structure/principles tight.

3 / 3

Actionability

It names concrete files and actions and gives one complete foreshadowing template, but the read/write flows are described in prose ('读取上一章摘要') rather than copy-paste-ready commands or grep examples, and concrete grep usage is only briefly hinted.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Read/write/init steps are clearly sequenced by phase, but there are no validation checkpoints or consistency-check feedback loops for destructive/batch updates (over-writing vs appending character state, foreshadowing status changes).

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

It is a single self-contained overview with well-organized sections and a concrete file tree; no bundle files exist and no external references are needed, so the structure is appropriate for an under-50-line-concept skill.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

60%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description states concrete capabilities and provides a keyword string for activation, but it omits an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause and leans on several generic keywords, leaving 'when' implicit and slightly raising conflict risk. A complete rewrite that adds explicit triggers and novel-domain keywords (人物档案、伏笔、世界观) would lift completeness and distinctiveness.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. '用于小说创作过程中持久化管理记忆。当需要记录或查阅角色设定、伏笔、章节摘要、世界观等设定时使用。'

Replace generic keywords (存储、查询、知识管理) with novel-domain natural terms users would say, such as 人物档案、伏笔、世界观、章节摘要、人物关系.

Frame everything in third person (it already is) and keep it concise while making the novel-writing niche explicit to reduce overlap with general knowledge-management skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions ("管理角色设定、章节摘要、伏笔追踪") naming the specific data managed rather than vague language like 'helps with documents'.

3 / 3

Completeness

It clearly answers 'what' (persistent memory via workspace files managing characters/summaries/foreshadowing), but there is no explicit 'Use when...' / '使用本技能当...' trigger clause, so 'when' is only implied by the keyword list.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The '关键词' string supplies relevant natural terms (记忆、存储、查询、设定、知识管理), but several are generic (存储、查询) and common novel-creation variations the user would actually say (人物档案、世界观、伏笔) are under-covered.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The novel-writing memory niche is fairly distinct, yet generic keywords (记忆、存储、查询、知识管理) could overlap with other knowledge-management skills, and no trigger phrase narrows it to the novel-writing domain.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
wanikua/danghuangshang
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.