CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

novel-prose

小说写作技法 - 当需要逐章执笔创作小说正文时触发。关键词:写作、执笔、章节、正文、创作。

69

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tight, well-structured instruction skill: concise, highly actionable with concrete numeric targets and file conventions, a clearly sequenced multi-step writing workflow, and a validation checklist. It needs no external references and appropriately earns top marks on each dimension.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean, well-organized instruction without explaining basic writing concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place and nothing reads as padded filler.

3 / 3

Actionability

Concrete, specific guidance throughout — concrete scene counts (5-8), explicit word count (10,000 中文字符), exact file path format (novel/{书名}/正文/第X章_{标题}.md), and a copy-ready self-audit checklist.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 分段写作法 gives a clearly numbered three-stage sequence with per-scene sub-steps and an explicit integration/review pass; the closing 自审检查清单 acts as a validation checkpoint, and the 禁止行为 section adds recovery guardrails.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist, but the skill is a self-contained single-purpose instruction skill under ~130 lines with well-organized sections and no nested references, which the rubric's simple-skills note allows to score 3.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

67%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is clear and distinct with good natural trigger terms, but it leans on a single action statement rather than enumerating multiple concrete capabilities, and the trigger guidance is a brief restatement rather than rich 'Use when...' guidance.

Suggestions

Enumerate 2-3 concrete actions (e.g., 逐章执笔正文、衔接场景、控制字数节奏) to lift specificity to a 3.

Expand the trigger clause into a 'Use when...' style listing several user phrasings (创作章节、续写正文、扩写场景) to strengthen completeness.

Keep the third-person voice, which is already correct.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (小说写作技法) and one concrete action (逐章执笔创作小说正文), but does not enumerate multiple specific actions like the score-3 anchor requires.

2 / 3

Completeness

It states what the skill does (创作小说正文) and gives an explicit trigger clause (当需要逐章执笔创作小说正文时触发), but the trigger is a single restatement rather than the varied 'Use when...' guidance the rubric rewards, capping completeness at 2.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Provides natural keywords users would actually say (写作、执笔、章节、正文、创作), covering common variations rather than technical jargon.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The novel-prose niche is distinct with clearly differentiated triggers (执笔、章节、正文) unlikely to conflict with sibling skills like planning or memory skills.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
wanikua/danghuangshang
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.