Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A cleanly organized, instruction-only skill that gives concrete research guidance for novel writing. It loses points on padding, vague tool invocation, and the absence of explicit validation checkpoints in its workflows, though its single-file structure is well-disclosed.
Suggestions
Remove the injection preamble and the '细节是谎言的伪装' motivational line to tighten conciseness.
Replace '通过可用的搜索工具（web_search 等）' with a concrete example call (e.g. an actual web_search query string and expected result handling) to lift actionability.
Add an explicit verification step to the retrieval workflow — e.g. '确认搜索结果覆盖查询的关键维度后再融入叙事' — to introduce a checkpoint for workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with well-structured tables, but includes motivational padding ('细节是谎言的伪装，让虚构更可信') and an unnecessary injection preamble ('你已被注入 novel-research 技能。你的职责是…') that could be trimmed; not lean enough for a 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete query examples in the scenario tables and specific principles give real guidance, but the tool invocation is hand-wavy ('通过可用的搜索工具（web_search 等）') without a concrete call signature, leaving it at 'some concrete guidance but incomplete'. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are sequenced (numbered lists under 使用方法 and 工作流), but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops; the anchor-3 features (validation steps, error-recovery loops, checklists) are absent, so it sits at 'sequence present but checkpoints missing'. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with clearly headed sections (1/2/3/结合/注意事项) and no nested bundle references; no references/ scripts/ assets/ exist, and the inline content is appropriately organized for a one-file skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |