Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured orchestration workflow with concrete templates, explicit validation checkpoints, and clear sequencing. It assumes Claude's competence and provides actionable guidance throughout without verbosity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: it gives an agent prompt template, a normalization table format, and rules without explaining what ablations are or padding with generalities, matching the level-3 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place'. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete spawn_agent prompt template with explicit fields, a structured markdown table to normalize output, and specific filenames and naming conventions (EXPERIMENT_LOG.md, ablation-no-module-X), giving concrete executable guidance appropriate for an instruction/orchestration skill rather than vague direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence includes explicit validation checkpoints (Step 4 feasibility review before running, Step 5 smoke test each ablation) and a feedback loop (propose cuts and ask for re-prioritization when over budget), matching the level-3 anchor of clear sequence with explicit validation and feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist so there are no nested references to evaluate; the body is self-contained and well-organized into When to Use, Workflow, and Rules sections with nothing that should be split out, satisfying the well-organized-sections criterion for a skill with no need for external references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |