Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable autonomous-loop skill with strong validation and error-recovery feedback loops. Main weaknesses are a slightly abstract parsing-script step, a large inline report template, and a dead external reference.
Suggestions
Provide a concrete, minimal parse_result.py skeleton (e.g., argparse + a regex/float-extraction stub) rather than only instructing the agent to 'write a parameter extraction script... or similar', so the most execution-critical step is copy-paste ready.
Externalize the large DSE_REPORT.md template (lines 200-245) into a references/REPORT_TEMPLATE.md and link to it, keeping SKILL.md as a leaner overview and improving progressive disclosure.
Fix or remove the broken shared-references/external-cadence.md links (no such bundle file exists); either ship the referenced file or inline the essential cadence guidance so the skill is self-contained.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and free of concept-explanation padding (no explanations of what gem5/yosys are), but the full report-template block and a few mildly redundant Key Rules passages add length that could be trimmed, keeping it at 4 rather than a clean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete file paths, CSV/JSON schemas, a parameter-inference strategy table, and copy-paste example invocations give mostly executable guidance; the one gap is that the metric-parsing script (the most execution-critical piece) is left abstract ("write a parameter extraction script... or similar") rather than provided as executable code. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four phases with numbered steps plus explicit validation checkpoints (constraint-met checks, "check dse_log.csv before each run", metric-comparability re-validation after a parser rewrite) and feedback loops for error recovery (crash→log→skip→continue; repeated crash→discard & reimplement→re-validate), so the destructive/batch cap of 3 does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with headers and one clearly-signaled one-level-deep reference; held to 4 because the skill is monolithic (large inline templates like the report block could be externalized) and the referenced shared-references/external-cadence.md is a broken external link with no bundle file present. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |