Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean patent-drafting skill with concrete templated guidance, an explicit claim-support verification checkpoint, and clear organization. It avoids teaching concepts Claude already knows and provides copy-ready structural examples and rules.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence; it provides constants, inputs, a structured workflow, and tight rules without explaining what a patent or embodiment is, and every section earns its tokens. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete executable guidance throughout: exact constants, file paths (patent/INVENTION_DISCLOSURE.md), templated opening phrasing, reference-numeral formatting rules, a worked pseudocode example, and explicit output location (patent/specification/detailed_description.md). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 6-step workflow with an explicit validation checkpoint in Step 4 (Claim Support Verification) that requires adding description for any unsupported claim element before proceeding — a feedback loop for a correctness-critical operation. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ absent) and the SKILL.md body is self-contained and well-organized into Constants, Inputs, Workflow, and Key Rules sections; per the rubric's simple-skill note, a well-organized single file with no external references scores 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |