Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, largely executable skill with a clear six-step workflow and explicit error paths for its fragile steps. Main weaknesses are duplicated script-resolution logic, verbose repo-policy prose, and a pseudocode Step 6 that keeps it from fully lean/executable.
Suggestions
Collapse the wiki-script resolution chain in Step 6 by referencing the Step 2 resolution pattern once, removing the duplicated bash block.
Replace the Step 6 pseudocode with a concrete executable example for a single arXiv and a single non-arXiv hit.
Trim the Constants section to the two facts (script name, MAX_RESULTS) and move the Policy D1 / install-chain prose to the referenced integration-contract.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and mostly earns its tokens, but the script-resolution chain appears twice (Step 2 and Step 6), the not-found user message duplicates the error already emitted in the bash, and the Policy D1 prose in Constants explains repo plumbing Claude doesn't need — several spots could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps 2-3 give copy-paste-ready bash (pip install, key export, search/find-similar/get-contents invocations with flags) and Step 4 defines a concrete output table, but Step 6's wiki-ingest block is pseudocode ("for each research-paper hit") rather than executable code — a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly sequenced steps with explicit error handling on script resolution (error message plus fix instructions) and per-hit fallback logic in Step 6 (skip ingest and log when metadata is missing); not a 5 because there is no feedback loop for search failures (API errors, empty results). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the two external references to shared-references/integration-contract.md are clearly signaled one-level-deep markdown links; sections are well organized, though the 15-flag argument reference and the duplicated resolution logic are inlined where a small reference file would fit — good structure with minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |