SSH job queue for multi-seed/multi-config ML experiments with OOM-aware retry, stale-screen cleanup, and wave-transition race prevention. Use when user says "batch experiments", "队列实验", "run grid", "multi-seed sweep", "auto-chain experiments", or when /run-experiment is insufficient for 10+ jobs that need orchestration.
71
88%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that clearly defines a specific niche (SSH-based ML experiment orchestration), lists concrete capabilities (OOM-aware retry, stale-screen cleanup, wave-transition race prevention), and provides explicit trigger terms in both English and Chinese. The explicit boundary with '/run-experiment' for 10+ jobs further reduces ambiguity and conflict risk.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: SSH job queue, multi-seed/multi-config ML experiments, OOM-aware retry, stale-screen cleanup, and wave-transition race prevention. These are highly specific capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (SSH job queue for ML experiments with OOM retry, cleanup, race prevention) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause with specific trigger phrases and a clear threshold of 10+ jobs needing orchestration). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms including 'batch experiments', '队列实验' (Chinese), 'run grid', 'multi-seed sweep', 'auto-chain experiments', and even references the boundary with '/run-experiment' for 10+ jobs. These are terms users would naturally say. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive niche: SSH-based ML experiment orchestration with specific features like OOM-aware retry and wave-transition race prevention. Explicitly distinguishes itself from '/run-experiment' for smaller jobs, reducing conflict risk. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a highly actionable and well-structured skill for orchestrating ML experiment queues, with excellent workflow clarity including explicit validation checkpoints, error recovery loops, and state machine definitions. Its main weakness is verbosity—the legacy resolver chain explanation, rationale sections, and comparison table inflate the token cost significantly. The content would benefit from splitting reference material into separate files to improve progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Move the legacy resolver chain details (Step 3a) into a separate RESOLVER.md or TROUBLESHOOTING.md, keeping only the final resolved command in the main skill
Extract the 'Rationale / Source', 'Comparison with /run-experiment', and 'Known Failure Modes' sections into a separate REFERENCE.md to reduce the main skill's token footprint by ~30%
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is quite long (~350+ lines) and includes some sections that could be trimmed—e.g., the 'Why This Exists' rationale, the 'Rationale / Source' section, the comparison table with /run-experiment, and detailed explanations of legacy shim chains. However, most content is genuinely instructive and not explaining things Claude already knows (it's project-specific orchestration logic). The legacy resolver chain in Step 3a is particularly verbose for what it accomplishes. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides fully executable bash commands, concrete YAML manifest examples, specific regex patterns for OOM detection, jq commands for monitoring, and complete code blocks for every step from manifest creation through launch, monitoring, and resume. The grid spec syntax and wave chaining examples are copy-paste ready with clear variable substitution patterns. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is clearly sequenced (Steps 1-5) with explicit validation checkpoints: pre-flight checks in Step 2, state machine with clear transitions, wave transition conditions (4 explicit criteria), stale screen detection logic, OOM retry with bounded attempts, and resume-on-restart procedures. The feedback loops for error recovery (OOM → retry, stale → cleanup → requeue) are well-defined with explicit conditions. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references external scripts (queue_manager.py, build_manifest.py) and other skills (/run-experiment, /monitor-experiment, /analyze-results) appropriately, and the 'See Also' section provides clear navigation. However, the SKILL.md itself is monolithic—sections like the detailed resolver chain, the comparison table, the rationale section, and the known failure modes could be split into separate reference files. No bundle files were provided to verify referenced paths exist. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
66b974e
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.