Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured skill body with concrete templates, schema reference, and a validated multi-step workflow. The main weakness is verbosity in the tool-location resolver and references to out-of-bundle shared files.
Suggestions
Trim the "Tool Location" history (e.g. "Phase 3.1 (Arch C) move") and collapse the 4-layer resolver into a shorter chain with the fallback detail moved to a referenced doc.
Make the two ../shared-references/ links (integration-contract.md, review-tracing.md) clearly external/optional, or inline the minimal needed contract so the skill is self-contained.
Move the full Nodes/Edges/Groups schema table into a separate REFERENCE.md, leaving only the most-used fields inline to reduce SKILL.md token load.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence (no padding about what SVG/JSON is), but the "Tool Location" section carries implementation-history noise ("Phase 3.1 (Arch C) move") and a lengthy 4-layer resolver chain that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste ready commands ("python3 \"$FIGURE_RENDERER\" render/validate/schema"), concrete JSON templates for each diagram type, and a full schema table with defaults and notes cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps with an explicit "Validate first" checkpoint, a fix-and-re-render feedback loop, a visual-review checklist, and a Codex iterate-until-≥7 recovery loop. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with a confirmed bundle file (scripts/figure_renderer.py) and mostly one-level-deep references; two references point to ../shared-references/ outside the bundle, slightly muddying navigation. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |