Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong operational runbook: fully executable commands, defensive input validation for untrusted web content, and a clearly sequenced six-step workflow with documented failure modes. The main improvement areas are trimming the duplicated script-resolution block and adding an explicit on-failure feedback step.
Suggestions
Factor out the duplicated ARIS_REPO fallback-resolution block: define it once in Step 2 and have Step 6 reference it ("resolve with the same chain as Step 2") instead of repeating ~15 lines verbatim.
Add an explicit failure-handling step after Step 3, e.g. 'On exit 1: report the stderr error to the user and suggest re-running with content: none or fewer results; on exit 429/402: mention the credit/rate limit' — turning documented exit codes into an actionable feedback loop.
Make the shared-references links consistent (use the same '../shared-references/' prefix in both Step 6 references) and ensure those files ship alongside the skill so the one-level-deep references resolve.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and operational with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but the ~15-line ARIS_REPO fallback-resolution block is duplicated verbatim between Steps 2 and 6, and quoting/untrusted-content rules repeat between Step 3 and Key Rules. This matches anchor 4's 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed' — the padding is duplication rather than the unnecessary explanation of anchor 3. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Everything is copy-paste ready: the full script-resolution shell block, concrete python3 invocations for search, filtered search, results-only, and scrape modes, an override-to-flag mapping table, documented exit codes, and a result-table template. Specific examples cover the common cases, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly sequenced steps with explicit validation gates — the URL regex check before scraping, the arXiv-ID regex check before shell use, exit-code semantics, and error messages with concrete fixes. It stops short of anchor 5 because there is no explicit feedback loop telling Claude what to do on failure (retry, report, fall back), only how failures are reported; the skill is read-only rather than destructive, so the cap-at-3 rule does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned single runbook with clearly signaled one-level-deep references to integration-contract.md and citation-discipline.md that keep contract details out of the body. Minor gaps: the referenced shared-references files are not part of this bundle, and one citation drops the '../' prefix ("shared-references/integration-contract.md" vs "../shared-references/integration-contract.md") — anchor 4's 'good structure, references mostly clear, minor organization gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |