Conciseness

The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence without explaining what formulas or derivations are, but the Inputs section and Step 1's extraction list overlap, introducing mild redundancy that could be tightened.

Actionability

Provides concrete, executable guidance including a copy-paste-ready Required File Structure template, explicit step-classification taxonomy, and three named output modes with their contents; minor gaps remain in that some steps describe what to decide rather than exactly how to format it.

Workflow Clarity

An explicit 8-step sequence with a dedicated Step 8 Final Verification checklist and a feedback loop (downgrade to a blocker report when coherence cannot be achieved honestly), giving clear checkpoints and error recovery for the file-writing operation.

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clearly headed sections with no nested references and a single self-contained file; since it exceeds 50 lines with no external bundle files, some inline material (output modes, proof-writer relationship) could conceptually be split, leaving minor organization gaps.

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ('build a theory line, organize assumptions, turn scattered equations into a coherent derivation, or rewrite theory notes into a paper-ready formula document') rather than vague language, though the actions are conceptual rather than file-level operations, leaving minor coverage gaps versus a fully exhaustive enumeration.

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (Structures and derives research formulas, building a theory line and coherent derivation package) and 'when' ('Use when the derivation target is not yet fully fixed, the main object still needs to be chosen, or the user needs a coherent derivation package rather than a finished theorem proof') with concrete trigger phrases.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases a user would say ('推导公式', 'build a theory line', 'organize assumptions', 'rewrite theory notes into a paper-ready formula document') with good keyword coverage, though a few common synonyms or alternate phrasings are absent.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The narrow niche (derivation package construction) and explicit contrast 'rather than a finished theorem proof' keep conflict risk low, with only minor overlap against a closely related proof-writing skill.