Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured orchestration skill with explicit phase checkpoints, feedback loops, and concrete commands throughout. Its main weakness is mild template redundancy and a lack of bundled reference files to push detail off the main body.
Suggestions
Trim the Phase 5 report template and per-phase 'What this does' bullets to reduce redundancy, since the pipeline diagram and Key Rules already convey the essentials.
Extract the per-phase sub-skill behavior summaries into a references/ file linked from each phase, keeping the SKILL.md body as a lean orchestration overview.
Consolidate the checkpoint prompt templates into a single reusable block referenced once, rather than re-stating the AUTO_PROCEED handling at each checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean for its complexity, but the Phase 5 report template and the repeated 'What this does' bullets introduce some redundancy that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Each phase ships a concrete slash invocation ('/research-lit "$ARGUMENTS"'), specific tunable constants, and copy-paste checkpoint templates that cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 1-5 are clearly sequenced with explicit 🚦 checkpoints, feedback loops (user requests changes → refine and repeat), and validation/kill rules (timeouts, eliminate already-published ideas), satisfying the batch-operation validation requirement. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-sectioned and shared protocols are linked one level deep ('../../shared-references/...'), but most guidance is inlined and no bundle files (references/scripts/assets) exist to offload detail. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |