Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-structured, and actionable with a clear phased workflow and report template. The main gaps are implicit validation checkpoints between phases and a referenced shared file that is not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation/branching checkpoints between phases (e.g., "If no overlapping papers found for a claim, broaden queries before moving on" and "Confirm every core claim has been searched before writing the report") to lift workflow clarity.
Replace the pseudocode spawn_agent config block with a concrete, copy-pasteable invocation showing the actual call syntax and prompt arguments.
Either create the referenced ../shared-references/review-tracing.md or inline the tracing format so the skill is self-contained.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean and efficient with no padded concept explanations; the Constants block and Phase A's explanatory bullets are slightly verbose but mostly earn their place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete tool names (WebSearch, WebFetch, spawn_agent), specific query guidance, and a copy-ready report template, but the spawn_agent invocation is sketched as a config block rather than executable call syntax and venue checks are hints rather than commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-phase sequence (A-D) is present, but validation checkpoints between phases are implicit or absent (e.g., no "if no overlapping papers found" branch, no coverage confirmation before reporting). | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-organized file under 90 lines with clear section headers and one clearly-signaled one-level reference (review-tracing.md); minor gap is that the referenced shared file does not actually exist in the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |