Verify research idea novelty against recent literature. Use when user says "查新", "novelty check", "有没有人做过", "check novelty", or wants to verify a research idea is novel before implementing.
64
75%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./skills/skills-codex/novelty-check/SKILL.mdLow
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
SKILL.md Phase B requires runtime WebFetch of abstracts/“related work” from potentially arbitrary web sources (public web content fetched at runtime), and Phase C then includes “all papers found in Phase B” plus the proposed method in the spawned reviewer agent prompt—so outsider-authored free text can enter the LLM context via the WebSearch/WebFetch → Phase B papers → Phase C prompt.
f4f20f9
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.