Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a focused, well-structured overlay with concrete MCP prompts and explicit checkpoints, but it delegates the core phase/gate workflow to an external base mirror that is not included in the bundle, leaving the standalone skill incomplete.
Suggestions
Inline or summarize the phase/gate sequence from the base mirror so the skill is self-contained, since the referenced skills/skills-codex/paper-poster-html/ is not part of this bundle.
Deduplicate the poll-until-done instructions by extracting them once into a shared "Reviewer polling" subsection referenced by both review phases.
Verify that ../../shared-references/review-tracing.md exists in the bundle or inline its key expectations, so review tracing is actionable without an external file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The overlay is lean and assumes Claude's competence without explaining known concepts, though the poll-until-done instructions are repeated across both review sections and could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready MCP call prompts with full templates and imagePaths, but key execution details (phases, gates, fix vocabulary) are delegated to an external base mirror rather than included. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Explicit validation checkpoints ("All hard gates PASS... first. Then") and a feedback loop ("Any fix → back through Phase 4/5 gates — never straight to re-review") are present, though the full phase sequence lives in the delegated base mirror. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section headers are clean, but the skill relies on a non-bundled external base mirror (skills/skills-codex/paper-poster-html/) and shared-references file that are not present in this bundle, making navigation partly unresolved. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |