Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear, well-validated phased workflow and executable code/templates. It is slightly verbose in places and, lacking any bundle files, keeps content monolithic rather than splitting large templates into referenced files.
Suggestions
Move the full beamer LaTeX template, talk-script manuscript, and Q&A templates into reference files under references/ and link to them one level deep to improve progressive disclosure.
Trim inferable narrative ('Unlike posters... slides tell a temporal story') and placeholder prose to tighten conciseness and respect the token budget.
Bundle the referenced tools/extract_paper_style.py helper and shared-references/integration-contract.md, or remove the references if they are not part of this skill, so referenced paths are real and verifiable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with concrete commands and templates, but includes exposition Claude could infer (the 'Unlike posters... slides tell a temporal story' narrative, long rationale tables, and full placeholder-prose templates for the talk script and Q&A) that could be tightened. Not a 3 because of this padded narrative and template prose; not a 1 because the bulk is concrete, executable guidance rather than concept explanation. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable guidance: concrete bash checks ('which pdflatex', 'ls $PAPER_DIR/sections/*.tex'), a complete beamer LaTeX template, a python-pptx generation script outline, and an explicit state JSON schema. Not a 2 because the code is complete and copy-paste ready rather than pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | An explicit 8-phase sequence (0-8) with state persistence after each phase, a STOP checkpoint in Phase 1, and a Phase 4 validation loop (parse error → fix → recompile, max 3 attempts, pdfinfo page-count verification) plus AUTO_PROCEED=false enforcing confirmation. Not a 2 because validation checkpoints and feedback loops are explicit, not merely implied. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ absent), yet the ~600-line body keeps large inline templates (full LaTeX template, talk script, Q&A) that could be split into reference files, and references an external helper (tools/extract_paper_style.py) and shared-references/integration-contract.md not present in the bundle. Not a 3 because content that should be separate is inline and referenced paths are unverifiable; not a 1 because sections are well-organized and references are at most one level deep. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |