Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear, well-validated multi-round workflow and concrete MCP integration. Its weaknesses are token efficiency (long inline prompts and redundant rules) and progressive disclosure (everything inline with no reference files).
Suggestions
Move the long Round-1 office-action prompt and the Round-2 follow-up prompt into reference files (e.g. references/round1_prompt.md) and link to them, reducing inline tokens and improving progressive disclosure.
Trim the Key Rules section to points not already covered by the workflow steps (e.g. the xhigh-effort and persona rules are already stated in Constants/Step 2) to reduce redundancy.
Collapse the seven examination-category sub-bullets into a referenced checklist so the core SKILL.md body stays a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | It assumes Claude's competence with no concept-padding, but the ~60-line embedded office-action prompt and the Key Rules section (which restates workflow guidance) could be tightened, matching the mostly-efficient anchor rather than fully lean. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready MCP tool calls with exact model and config (gpt-5.6-sol, xhigh reasoning), concrete file paths (patent/CLAIMS.md, patent/PATENT_REVIEW.md), and a full report template — fully executable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with severity-based fix prioritization, an explicit round-2 re-examination feedback loop, and a final completion checklist — the strongest anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned into headers, but as a single ~200-line file with large inline prompt templates and no bundle references to offload detail, it stops at the some-structure anchor rather than a clean overview-plus-references split. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |