Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A very strong orchestration skill body: the workflow is unambiguous, rich in exact artifacts, status labels, and validation gates, with all in-body reference paths resolving to real files. The main weakness is token efficiency — authorization and gating rules are restated multiple times and the notation scorecard is duplicated between the body and its reference file.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated authorization rules: state the browser/API/DeepSeek authorization boundaries once (e.g., in Guardrails) and reference that single statement from Workflow steps 4 and 7 and the Optional DeepSeek Audit intro instead of restating them in each place.
Remove the inlined seven-line scorecard from the Notation Gate section and rely solely on the instruction to copy it verbatim from references/notation-audit.md, eliminating the risk of divergence between the two copies.
Move the GPT Pro Output Repair and Manual Handoff Contract detail into a reference file (e.g., extend the existing references/) and keep only the contract summary inline, which would also let the body stay under ~200 lines.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and directive-heavy with no filler explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but several critical rules are repeated 3-4 times across sections: the DeepSeek explicit-request gate appears in Role, Workflow step 4, the Optional DeepSeek Audit intro, and Guardrails; GPT Pro authorization rules repeat in Role, step 7, and Guardrails; and the seven-line notation scorecard is both inlined in the Notation Gate section and re-copied from references/notation-audit.md in step 5. This matches 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than the verbose padding of anchor 2. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only orchestration skill the guidance is copy-paste-level concrete: exact run-directory pattern 'prompts/<YYMMDDHH-num>/', a per-file layout with each file's role, 14 exact status labels, the exact seven-line scorecard, the completion marker 'END_GPT_PRO_OUTPUT', concrete repair rules ('\\left{' to '\\left\\{'), and enumerated source-manifest and handoff field contracts. No significant execution gaps remain. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The default route is stated explicitly ('freeze target -> local proof -> local correctness audit -> exposition edit -> final'), followed by 8 numbered steps with explicit validation gates (Notation Gate, Derivation Structure Gate, audit before READY_FOR_USER, scorecard thresholds, completion-marker check) and feedback loops for error recovery (NEEDS_GPT_PRO_REDO to a focused redo prompt, blocked handoff on missing sources, DEEPSEEK_REVIEW_BLOCKED). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body references to references/notation-audit.md, proof-audit-rubric.md, deepseek-routing.md, and audit-output-contract.md are all real files, clearly signaled at the right decision points, and one level deep. However, two bundle files (dispatch-prompts.md, stress-tests.md) are never referenced from the body and are therefore undiscoverable, and roughly 250 lines of inline process detail (e.g., GPT Pro Output Repair, Manual Handoff Contract) could live in reference files, keeping this at 'good structure with minor organization gaps' rather than the fully split structure of anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |