Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptionally actionable, well-sequenced multi-phase workflow with strong validation discipline and concrete templates throughout. The main cost is token efficiency — recurring justificatory prose repeats the same two rationales multiple times, and large prompt/example blocks could live in reference files.
Suggestions
State the same-family-blindness rationale once (e.g. in shared-references/reviewer-independence.md, already linked) and reduce its four to five restatements in the intro, acceptance-gate table, Phase 4 preamble, and anti-patterns list to single-clause pointers.
Move the verbatim Phase 4 sweep prompt into a reference file (e.g. shared-references or a bundle reference) and keep only its invocation contract and scope-limit headline inline, cutting ~60 lines from the always-loaded body.
Consolidate the declare-before-act rationale (two invariants section, Phase 0 step 3, anti-patterns) into one canonical statement, keeping the later mentions as one-line cross-references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense operational instruction rather than concept explanation, but the same-family-blindness rationale is restated at least five times (intro, acceptance-gate provenance, Phase 4 routing, anti-patterns) and the declare-before-act rationale three times — real tightening is available without losing operational content. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable throughout: exact artifact paths and markdown schemas for the ledger and ladder, a verbatim Phase 4 reviewer prompt with a concrete JSON config block, exit-code acceptance checks, and a complete worked example covering the common case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 0–5 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (per-rung one-command checks, re-running all earlier rungs, fix budgets, batch points, sweep re-rounds, blocker protocol) and feedback loops for error recovery at every failure point. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Shared policy is well externalized to one-level-deep, clearly-signaled links (effort contract, reviewer routing, acceptance gates) plus a See Also section, but no bundle files exist alongside the skill to verify those targets, and the ~60-line verbatim Phase 4 prompt and full worked example are inlined candidates for extraction into reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |