Get a deep critical review of research from GPT using a secondary Codex agent. Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.
64
76%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
High
Do not use without reviewing
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./skills/skills-codex/research-review/SKILL.mdSecurity
1 high severity finding. You should review these findings carefully before considering using this skill.
The skill handles credentials insecurely by requiring the agent to include secret values verbatim in its generated output. This exposes credentials in the agent’s context and conversation history, creating a risk of data exfiltration.
This skill explicitly instructs the agent to include "full research context" and to paste file contents into spawn_agent/send_input because "the external model cannot read your files," which would force the LLM to transmit any secrets present in those files verbatim to a downstream model (exfiltration risk).
f4f20f9
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.