Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, executable workflow with strong sequencing and validation for destructive operations. The main weaknesses are a jargon-dense env-contract paragraph and templated placeholders that keep commands from being fully copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly tight bash/python snippets and imperative steps, but the 'environment contract' paragraph (lines 23-30) leans on dense jargon like 'seeded kernel witness' and 'agent-follows-doc pass' that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable ssh/screen/rsync/modal commands cover the common cases, but heavy use of placeholders (<server>, <exp_name>) and the wandb snippet's undefined WANDB_PROJECT/{...hyperparams...} are minor gaps from fully copy-paste-ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-7 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (pre-flight GPU check, Step 5 verify launch, Step 7 'do not destroy' if artifact copy fails) and a Key Rules checklist, satisfying the destructive/batch validation requirement. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into labeled Workflow steps, Key Rules, and an AGENTS.md Example, and the single external reference ('../shared-references/compute-env-contract.md') is one level deep and clearly signaled, though no bundle files exist and the AGENTS.md example is inlined. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |