Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, actionable instruction body for a simple skill with no unnecessary padding. Adding brief section headers and an example question would round out progressive disclosure and actionability.
Suggestions
Add a couple of lightweight section headers (e.g., '## How to interview', '## When to explore the codebase') to give the short body clear organization.
Include one or two example questions to make the interviewing style concrete and lift actionability.
Optionally note how to know when shared understanding is reached, so the workflow has an explicit stopping condition.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean four-line body where every line earns its place ('Ask the questions one at a time', 'If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore the codebase instead') with no padding or over-explanation. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable directives (one question at a time, provide a recommended answer per question, explore the codebase when an answer is findable there) but lacks concrete examples of question types to fully cover common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple, non-destructive interactive skill the single action is unambiguous and well-sequenced (ask one at a time, resolve branches one-by-one, recommend an answer, defer to codebase exploration), satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Short self-contained body with no nested references, but it has no section headers or organizational markers, so it falls just short of the 'well-organized sections' expected for a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |