Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-organized API catalog: exact import statements, exact source paths, and an unambiguous lookup workflow with zero wasted tokens. Its only real gap is that it never says what the three abstractions do or how to call them, deferring entirely to the source files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~30-line body has zero padding and explains nothing Claude already knows; every line is either a lookup instruction or a catalog entry. This matches anchor 5 — lean, every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Each entry gives a copy-paste import statement and an exact source path, and "You MUST read the source file to get the exact interface and types" is concrete direction. Not 5 because no entry states what each abstraction does or shows a usage example; not 3 because the entries are real, executable imports rather than pseudocode. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three-step sequence (find abstraction → read source → import) is clear and ordered. Anchor 4 fits: the sequence is explicit with a minor gap (nothing past the import step); no validation is needed for this read-only lookup, so the destructive/batch cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external bundle files, and is cleanly sectioned ("How to Use", "Abstractions") with detail correctly deferred one level deep to the actual source files. This matches the rubric's simple-skill exception for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |