Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured catalog that gives concrete imports and source pointers with a clear usage workflow. Its only gap is the absence of an invocation example, which keeps actionability just short of perfect.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no concept re-explanation: a 4-step usage list and two terse entries (name/import/source/one-line description), matching the score-5 anchor of assuming Claude's competence with every token earning its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives copy-paste-ready import statements and explicit source-file paths to read, fitting the score-4 anchor of mostly executable guidance with minor gaps; the gap is that no example shows how to actually instantiate or invoke a use case. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered 'How to Use' sequence (find -> read source -> import -> consult pattern skills) is explicit and unambiguous for this simple catalog lookup, qualifying for the score-5 simple-skill exception; no validation checkpoint is needed because the operation is non-destructive. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections (How to Use, Abstractions) and clearly signaled one-level references (source paths and sibling pattern skills), matching the score-5 anchor; no bundle files exist to verify, but the structure is appropriately thin. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |