Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary minimal catalog: well-structured, token-efficient, with concrete import statements and correct progressive disclosure that defers detail to source files and companion pattern skills. The only gap is the absence of even a minimal usage snippet or interface sketch per abstraction, which keeps actionability at 4 rather than 5.
Suggestions
Add a one-line minimal usage snippet per abstraction (e.g. how TaskDefinition is registered or how TaskService.trigger is called) so the reader gets a copy-paste starting point without opening the source.
Optionally list the key lifecycle hooks/events for TaskDefinition in a compact line so the reader knows what to look for in the source file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean catalog: a 4-step 'How to Use' list plus two per-abstraction entries with exactly Name/Import/Source/Description and nothing else. There is zero padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Each entry gives a copy-paste import statement ('import { TaskDefinition } from "webiny/api/tasks"') and an exact source path, plus an explicit instruction to read the source for exact types — 'mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps'. It falls short of 5 because there is no usage example at all, so the reader must reconstruct usage entirely from the external source file. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple, single-purpose catalog skill under 50 lines, and the 'How to Use' sequence (find abstraction → read source file → import → consult pattern skills) is unambiguous with each step concrete. Per the simple-skill exception the single action scores 5; no validation steps are needed since nothing here is destructive or batch-operating. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is short (<50 lines) with well-organized sections, keeps only overview-level detail in SKILL.md, and pushes exact interfaces to the source files and implementation patterns to the two named sibling skills — exactly the one-level-deep pointer structure the rubric rewards. No bundle files exist to inline or misplace, and no references are buried. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |