Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, well-structured catalog with concrete import statements and source paths, and a clear usage workflow. The main gap is the absence of explicit verification checkpoints and interface details being deferred entirely to source.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Each abstraction is a lean Name/Import/Source block with no concept over-explanation, and the body assumes Claude's competence, matching the score-5 anchor 'Lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The body provides concrete, copy-paste-ready import statements and exact source paths plus a numbered usage process, but defers interface/type details to the source file, fitting the score-4 anchor 'Mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'How to Use' steps are a clear, ordered find -> read source -> import -> consult patterns sequence, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints, matching the score-4 anchor 'Clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into clear 'How to Use' and 'Abstractions' sections with well-signaled pointers to two related skills and no nested references, though the catalog itself is fully inlined rather than split out, fitting the score-4 anchor 'Good structure; most content is appropriately placed'. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |