Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured catalog: concise usage steps and concrete import/source entries for each abstraction. It excels on token efficiency and structure; its only real gap is that it relies entirely on reading external source files for usage details rather than showing a minimal usage snippet.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — a short How-to-Use list plus two minimal abstraction entries with no concept explanations or padding, matching 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place'; not below 5 because nothing is superfluous. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete copy-paste imports and exact source paths are provided for each abstraction, matching 'mostly executable guidance; concrete code with minor gaps'; not a 5 because actual usage patterns are deferred to reading the source rather than shown inline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence (find abstraction → read source → import) is given for a simple catalog skill with no destructive operations, matching 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present'; not a 5 because there is no guidance for the case where no abstraction matches the need. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files and uses well-organized sections (How to Use, Abstractions) plus one-level-deep pointers to source files, matching the simple-skill exception for a top score; not below 5 because structure and navigation are clear. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |