Conciseness

The body is a lean catalog: a 3-step usage note and two terse entry blocks with no concept explanations, padding, or restatement of what Claude already knows. Every token earns its place, matching anchor 5.

Actionability

Import statements ('import { LoggerService } from "webiny/cli"') are copy-paste executable and exact source paths are given, with an explicit instruction to read the source for the interface. It sits at anchor 4 rather than 5 because no usage example for either service is included, leaving a minor gap for the common cases.

Workflow Clarity

The find-abstraction → read-source → import sequence is numbered and unambiguous, and as a simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no destructive or batch operations, no validation checkpoints are needed — the simple-skill exception applies. It is not below 5 because nothing in the sequence is implicit.

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is well under 50 lines with no need for bundle files (none exist in references/, scripts/, or assets/), and content is organized into clear 'How to Use' and 'Abstractions' sections with one-level-deep 'Source:' pointers that are explicitly signaled — matching the simple-skill guidance for a top score.

Specificity

The description 'cli — 2 abstractions.' names the domain (cli) and a count but contains no concrete actions or capabilities whatsoever — no verbs describing what the skill does. It matches anchor 2 ('names the domain but actions are minimal or generic') and not anchor 3, which requires 1-2 concrete actions.

Completeness

The 'what' is extremely vague — it does not state that this is a catalog/reference of abstractions or what it does with them — and there is no 'when' guidance at all (the judging guidelines cap completeness at 3 for a missing 'Use when...' clause). Anchor 2 ('has a vague what and no when') is the best fit; it is above anchor 1 only because the domain is at least named.

Trigger Term Quality

The only keyword is 'cli', a single generic term; natural phrases a user would actually say (webiny, logging, ui, command line) are entirely absent. This matches anchor 2 ('one or two generic keywords; missing the natural phrases users say') and falls well short of anchor 3's 'some relevant keywords'.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'cli' alone would collide with virtually any CLI-related skill, and the description omits 'webiny' entirely, so it carves out no niche. This matches anchor 2 ('very broad; high overlap risk with many similar skills') rather than anchor 3, which requires at least some domain narrowing.