Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean, well-structured catalog whose only real weakness is that its core instruction — read the source files for exact interfaces — points to files not included in the skill bundle, leaving the workflow's middle step unexecutable and the entries without any interface or usage detail. The conciseness is excellent; the gaps are all downstream of the missing bundle files. Bundling the five .ts source files (or inlining minimal interface signatures) would lift actionability and workflow clarity to match.
Suggestions
Bundle the five referenced source files under references/ (e.g., references/admin.ts) and point 'Source:' at those resolvable paths so the mandatory 'read the source file' step can actually be performed.
Add a one-line usage example per abstraction (or a single representative snippet) so the catalog shows how an extension is defined against one of these abstractions, not just how to import it.
Optionally add a short note on how the five abstractions differ (one phrase each, e.g., 'Admin — admin app extension points') so 'find the abstraction you need' in step 1 is navigable without opening every source file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean catalog: 'Find the abstraction you need below', 'You MUST read the source file to get the exact interface and types!', and five terse Name/Import/Source entries with zero padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Every token earns its place, matching the anchor for lean and efficient content. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The import statements (e.g., 'import { Admin } from "webiny/extensions"') are copy-paste ready, but there are no usage examples and the 'Source:' paths ('@webiny/project-aws/admin.ts') do not resolve inside the skill bundle — no references/ or scripts/ files exist — so the mandated 'read the source file' step cannot be executed as written. This fits 'mostly executable guidance with minor gaps' rather than fully executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three-step usage sequence (find abstraction → read source file → import) is clear and unambiguous for this simple, non-destructive lookup skill, which the simple-skill note would allow to score 5. However, the middle step points to files absent from the bundle, a real gap that drops it to anchor 4 ('clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor gaps'). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines with clean, well-organized sections ('How to Use', 'Abstractions') and a consistent per-entry format, and no nested references exist. It misses a 5 because the five referenced source files are not bundled — the pointers are clear but unresolvable within the skill, a minor organization gap per the bundle-structure guideline. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |