Conciseness

The body is efficient — every code block is a distinct load-bearing file of the five-file extension and no space is spent explaining concepts Claude already knows — but there is mild repetition: the 'abstractions.ts and feature.ts are ALWAYS standalone files' rule is stated three times (TL;DR, section notes, and the closing 'Iron rule'), and the File Structure section restates the TL;DR list. This fits 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' rather than level 5's 'every token earns its place'.

Actionability

All five files are given as complete, copy-paste-ready TypeScript/TSX (registration JSX, abstractions, feature wiring, presenter class, reactive view) with imports, a props table, the webiny.config.tsx registration line, and concrete API usage examples. This matches the level-5 'fully executable; copy-paste ready' anchor.

Workflow Clarity

The build sequence is clear (TL;DR five-file decomposition, sections in dependency order, File Structure summary) and the runtime flow is spelled out in the numbered 'How It Works' list, including the dirty-flag outcome. It is not level 5 because there is no validation/verification step (e.g., run the app and confirm the wizard renders for the configured modelIds) and submit-failure handling appears only implicitly in the view code.

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent), and the single-file body is well-sectioned with a clearly signaled one-level pointer to the 'webiny-form-model' skill for field/layout/validation detail instead of duplicating it. The 'Key APIs' section holds a modest amount of API reference inline that could live in a reference file, keeping this at 'good structure; minor organization gaps' rather than level 5.

Specificity

The description lists multiple concrete actions — 'show a custom wizard UI before the entry form', 'collecting fields like title, slug, or category upfront, then pre-filling the entry form' — and even enumerates the specific APIs covered (ContentEntryEditorConfig.NewEntryWizard, createFeature, FormModelFactory, createReactiveComponent, useContentEntryFormPresenter, dirty-flag on setData). Coverage is comprehensive for the skill's scope, matching the level-5 anchor rather than the 'minor gaps' of level 4.

Completeness

It explicitly answers 'what' ('Building a New Entry Wizard for the Headless CMS... collecting fields... then pre-filling the entry form') and 'when' ('Use this skill when the developer wants to show a custom wizard UI before the entry form when creating new CMS entries') with concrete trigger phrases, matching the level-5 anchor exactly; not level 4 because the 'when' clause is explicit and specific rather than improvable.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrases users would say are present: 'New Entry Wizard', 'creating new CMS entries', 'wizard UI', 'pre-filling the entry form', plus field names (title, slug, category). However, the platform name (Webiny) never appears and there are no synonyms for the entry-creation flow, so coverage is good but not fully comprehensive per the level-4 anchor.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The wizard-before-entry-form trigger is a clear niche with minimal conflict risk, but the description also 'Covers' shared Webiny APIs (createFeature, FormModelFactory, createReactiveComponent) that likely appear in sibling Webiny skills, creating minor overlap risk with closely related skills per the level-4 anchor.