Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with complete executable code and a clear structure, lightly held back by minor repetition and the absence of an explicit validation checkpoint in the workflow.
Suggestions
Consolidate the 'ALWAYS a standalone file' rule so it is stated once (e.g., in the File Structure section) rather than repeated across TL;DR, Abstractions, Feature, and the iron rule.
Add a brief validation/check step to the build flow (e.g., 'confirm the wizard renders for the configured modelIds and that the entry form opens dirty after submit') to strengthen workflow_clarity.
Consider moving the Key APIs reference detail into a references/ file and keeping only the most-used call (newEntry) inline to tighten progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and Webiny-specific without explaining basics Claude already knows, but the 'ALWAYS a standalone file' rule and five-file enumeration recur across TL;DR, section bodies, and File Structure, adding mild repetition. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides complete, copy-paste-ready TypeScript/TSX for all five files (registration, abstractions, feature, presenter, view) plus a props table and concrete API call examples covering the common case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step 'How It Works' runtime sequence and an explicit file-structure/iron-rule layout give an unambiguous build path, though no explicit validation or error-recovery checkpoint is included. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into focused sections with a clearly signaled one-level cross-reference to the sibling webiny-form-model skill; no nested references, though some Key APIs content could theoretically live in a separate reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |