Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured procedural skill with clear sequencing, validation checkpoints, and clean progressive disclosure to real bundle files. The main improvement area is adding a small inline code snippet so Claude can act without first opening the template.
Suggestions
Include a minimal inline session-creation code snippet in Step 3 so the core flow is executable without opening the template file.
Tighten a few justification clauses (e.g. the availability() capability-check note) to recover tokens.
Add a one-line example of a supported vs. unsupported language/format combination in Error Handling for NotSupportedError recovery.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean procedural prose with no padding about basic concepts; each step is actionable. A few explanatory clauses (e.g. 'Treat availability() as a capability check, not a guarantee') could be trimmed but earn their place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands (`node scripts/find-writing-assistance-targets.mjs .`) and specific API calls (`availability()`, `create()`, `destroy()`, `monitor`, `AbortController`) with named error types. No inline code examples, but it correctly delegates to the template and reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps with an explicit 'Step 5: Validate behavior' checkpoint, feedback loops in the Error Handling section, and a final build/typecheck/test gate. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Overview body points to one-level-deep, clearly-signaled bundle files (references/*.md, scripts/*.mjs, assets/*.template.ts) with 'Read X when Y' conditions; all referenced paths exist as real files. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |