Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An actionable, well-sequenced body with concrete commands and clear error handling. Its weak spots are mild repetition that hurts conciseness and a progressive-disclosure defect: a referenced script that is missing and an undocumented subcommand.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced `scripts/ccv-projects.mjs` so the bundle path actually resolves, or remove the reference if the logic is intended to be inline.
Document the `probe` subcommand shown in the usage line (`<list|probe|start>`) in its own capability section, or drop it from the synopsis.
Consolidate the repeated «single address line / never fabricate an address» rules into one place to tighten the body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with concrete commands and no extraneous concept explanations, but it repeats the same UX constraints («лише один рядок з адресою», «не вигадуй адресу») across «Можливість два» and «Стиль відповіді та межі», and «Можливість три» re-expands trigger cases already in the description, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste commands (`node scripts/ccv-projects.mjs <list|probe|start> [dir]`, `list`, `start <dir>`) with concrete output format and explicit success/failure handling. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The start workflow is a clear sequence — determine directory, run `start`, branch on success (return the single address line) vs. failure (read stderr, explain, list common cases) — with error-recovery guidance and validation delegated to the script's readiness check; not a destructive/batch operation, so no cap applies. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly labeled one-level sections and a single one-level-deep reference, but the referenced bundle `scripts/ccv-projects.mjs` does not exist on disk (no scripts/ directory) and the `probe` subcommand in the usage line is undocumented in any capability section. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |