Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a clear, mostly executable workflow for producing conventional commit messages with good structure and useful examples. Its weaknesses are redundancy (restated description and commit command), the absence of any pre-commit validation checkpoint, confusing Copilot-specific automation claims, and no guidance on including body/footer in the actual commit command.
Suggestions
Remove the Copilot-specific claims ('Copilot will automatically run the following command... no confirmation needed') and instead directly instruct running git commit, showing how to include body and footer via multiple -m flags or a heredoc.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint before committing: verify the type is one of the allowed types, the description is imperative, and breaking changes carry a 'BREAKING CHANGE:' footer.
Trim redundancy by deleting the '### Instructions' XML block (it restates the frontmatter description) and folding '### Final Step' into the workflow, keeping the body to workflow, structure, examples, and validation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly compact but contains clear redundancy: the '### Instructions' XML block restates the frontmatter description almost verbatim, and '### Final Step' repeats the git commit command already given in the workflow. The unnecessary XML wrapping of the examples and validation sections adds padding that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands are given for every workflow step (git status, git diff, git add, git commit -m), along with a complete message template and six concrete examples. Minor gaps remain: the skill never shows how to actually include a body or footer in the commit command (e.g., multiple -m flags), and the '<scope>()</scope>' placeholder is confusing, so it falls short of fully copy-paste-ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence (status → diff → add → construct message → commit) is present and ordered, but there is no validation checkpoint before committing (e.g., verifying the type is allowed or the message conforms), and the 'Validation' section only lists field rules rather than a verification step. Steps 5-6 are also confusing, attributing execution to 'Copilot' with '(no confirmation needed)' — a tool that is not the executing agent — leaving checkpoints missing or implicit. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a small, self-contained skill with well-organized sections (Workflow, Commit Message Structure, Examples, Validation) and no content that warrants separate bundle files. The single external reference (the conventionalcommits.org specification URL) is a clean, one-level-deep link, satisfying the simple-skill case for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |