Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary reference skill: executable code with correct/incorrect contrast, Payload-specific defaults that go beyond common knowledge, and a clean one-level-deep reference architecture. The only notable improvement is de-duplicating guidance repeated across Security Pitfalls, Common Gotchas, and Best Practices.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with Payload-specific knowledge Claude genuinely lacks (slugField, _status, overrideAccess, autoGenerate) and code blocks earn their tokens, but the Local API access-control warning appears three times (Security Pitfalls, Common Gotchas, Best Practices) and the drafts/_status guidance is repeated across five sections — minor trimming candidates consistent with anchor 4 rather than the lean anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready executable TypeScript throughout: full buildConfig, slugField() usage, ❌/✅ overrideAccess pairs, req-threading for transactions, and getPayload() in both route handlers and Server Components, covering the common cases — fully matches anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Quick Start (create-payload-app → pnpm dev) and the build/type-generation decision guidance are clearly sequenced, and the collection-vs-field hook decision rule is explicit; however, the transaction and hook-loop patterns lack validate→fix→retry checkpoints, so it sits at anchor 4 rather than 5. It is not capped at 3 since the skill is reference/pattern-oriented rather than a destructive batch procedure. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A 28-row Quick Reference table maps each task to an anchored link in a topic file, per-section pointers ("For all field types... see FIELDS.md") keep detail one level deep, and a Reference Documentation section indexes all 11 topic files — clear overview with well-signaled one-level references, matching anchor 5. No bundle files were present in the review directory, so this is scored on the body's reference structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |