Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a well-sequenced, concrete facilitation workflow with useful quality checks and pitfalls, and is reasonably actionable as instruction-only guidance. Its weaknesses are redundancy with content Claude already knows, and a broken progressive-disclosure structure: it points to template.md and examples/sample.md that are not present while inlining everything in one long file.
Suggestions
Create the referenced `template.md` and `examples/sample.md` bundle files (or remove the references and keep the inline templates) so readers are not sent to missing files.
Trim the framework background Claude already knows — the Patton 2D-axis explanation, "Why This Works", and the When/When NOT sections largely restate the Purpose and the per-step quality checks.
Add an explicit feedback loop after Step 7 (e.g., 'if gaps are found, return to Step 3 and revise the backbone') and a worked example of release lines in Step 6 to strengthen workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly actionable template guidance, but includes background Claude already knows (the Patton framework's 2D axes, "Why This Works", "When to Use / When NOT to Use" lists) and duplicates the frontmatter intent verbatim as the Purpose opening. It fits 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' rather than the clearly verbose level-2 anchor, since much of the content is fill-in structure. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete fill-in markdown templates for every step, a worked persona example ("Sarah, 35-year-old freelance graphic designer..."), per-step quality checks, and pitfalls with symptom/consequence/fix provide mostly executable guidance. It falls short of fully copy-paste-ready because "Use `template.md` for the full fill-in structure" and "See `examples/sample.md`" point to files that do not exist in the bundle, and no complete worked story map is shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–7 are clearly numbered and sequenced, with per-step quality checks serving as checkpoints and Step 7 acting as a final review. It misses the level-5 anchor because there is no explicit feedback loop (e.g., 'if gaps are found in Step 7, revisit the activities') and the vertical prioritization step (Step 6) has no worked example of release lines. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body references `template.md` and `examples/sample.md`, but no bundle files exist, so those references are dangling; meanwhile a ~310-line monolith inlines the full per-step templates and pitfall catalog that belong in those separate files. This matches 'some structure but could be better organized; references present but not clearly signaled; content that should be separate is inline'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |