Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is concise, actionable, and well-structured, with executable commands, concrete authoring guidance, and a clean single-level reference to the README for deeper detail. It avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows and keeps every section purposeful.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes domain competence — it documents project-specific conventions (workspace reuse, env vars, judge model) rather than explaining concepts Claude already knows, and the Good/Bad example lists earn their tokens as actionable heuristics; it avoids the 'explains concepts Claude knows' pitfall of level 1 and the 'could be tightened' weakness of level 2. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready executable commands ('bun install', 'bun run cli -- run global ...', the env-var invocation) plus concrete numbered authoring rules and worked Good/Bad examples, matching the 'fully executable, copy-paste ready' anchor rather than the pseudocode/incomplete level-2 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (running benchmarks with env setup, a numbered authoring-rules list, and an explicit validation checklist distinguishing hard checks from semantic expectations); the operation is non-destructive (upserting an eval resource), so the absence of a destructive feedback loop does not cap the score, fitting the clear-sequence-with-checklist anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized into clearly delineated sections with a single, well-signaled one-level reference ('See ai_evals/README.md for the full case format'); no bundle files exist to nest, so the structure avoids the multi-level-reference and monolithic-wall pitfalls of the lower anchors. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |