Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured instruction skill with strong conciseness and clear organization. Minor gains are possible in actionability and an explicit recovery/feedback loop.
Suggestions
Add a brief example of how to phrase a sub-agent dispatch for facts, to make the actionability fully concrete.
Clarify what to do if the user gives conflicting or unclear answers (a small recovery checkpoint), strengthening the workflow's feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout; no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, with every line giving operational guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete question template and explicit rules for rounds, the frontier, and sub-agent dispatch, but lacks copy-paste-ready commands and leaves minor details like sub-agent invocation format implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear multi-step sequence (build tree, work frontier in rounds, recompute, repeat until empty, wait for confirmation) with an explicit completion checkpoint, though no dedicated error-recovery loop is specified. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no need for external references; content is well-organized into coherent sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |