Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with executable commands and complete SQL examples, and it sequences a non-trivial workflow with real validation checkpoints for the destructive/batch steps. It is somewhat verbose due to repeated deploy guidance and could split the PostgreSQL reference material, but overall well-structured.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely dense and avoids explaining basics, but deploy guidance ('git push or wmill sync push ... see the Deploying section') is restated across several sections and passages like the import-propagation explanation run long, so it could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable commands (`wmill script preview`, `wmill generate-metadata --dry-run`, `wmill generate-metadata rehash`, `wmill resource-type list --schema`) and complete, copy-paste-ready SQL examples cover parameter binding, S3Object ingestion, and S3 streaming. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The write → choose-preview-by-intent → sync-metadata → offer-test → deploy-only-when-asked flow has explicit checkpoints (diff regenerated locks, --dry-run stale listing, explicit-ask gate for the destructive deploy), though it is not presented as a single linear checklist. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so all content is inline, but the single SKILL.md is well-organized with clear section headers and signals external references explicitly ('see the Deploying section in AGENTS.wmill.md'); the inlined PostgreSQL detail is the main organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |