Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, lean, instruction-only skill whose session guidance is unusually concrete for its genre. Its one serious defect is that both of its external reference files are missing from the bundle, which both dead-ends navigation and leaves glossary and ADR formats unspecified.
Suggestions
Add the referenced GLOSSARY-FORMAT.md and ADR-FORMAT.md to the bundle, or inline minimal entry templates if the formats are short enough to stay within token budget.
Define what counts as a term being "resolved" (e.g., the user confirms a definition) so the update-inline step has an explicit trigger.
Trim the parenthetical contrasting with merely reading GLOSSARY.md and compress the multi-context directory tree to a short rule, since both restate scope already in the frontmatter.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, assumes Claude's competence (never explains what a glossary or ADR is), and gives concrete rules like "Create files lazily: only when you have something to write". Minor over-explanation remains: the parenthetical distinguishing active from merely reading GLOSSARY.md repeats frontmatter scope, and the second directory tree could be compressed. Not level 5 because those tokens could be trimmed; not level 3 because no padding or known-concept explanation exists. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-ready guidance throughout: example challenge dialogues ("Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y"), a three-condition numbered test for when to offer an ADR, and explicit file-layout rules. It falls short of level 5 because entry formats are delegated to GLOSSARY-FORMAT.md and ADR-FORMAT.md, which are absent from the bundle, leaving a key execution detail missing. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Session behaviors are each paired with a clear trigger (conflicting term, vague term, relationship discussion, code statement), and "Cross-reference with code" functions as a validation checkpoint. It is not level 5 because "when a term is resolved" lacks a criterion for recognizing resolution, and there is no verify step before writing an ADR or glossary entry; not level 3 because sequencing and checkpoints are mostly explicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Both external references — [GLOSSARY-FORMAT.md](./GLOSSARY-FORMAT.md) and [ADR-FORMAT.md](./ADR-FORMAT.md) — are well-signaled, one-level-deep links, but neither file exists anywhere in the bundle. The split is not actually realized: the format content is neither inlined nor in the referenced files, so navigation dead-ends. This sits between the broken-structure anchors of level 2 and the partial-structure level 3, noticeably below the midpoint. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |