Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill: an exact output template, a concrete scoring rubric, explicit safety gates, and clean one-level-deep per-OS references. The only slack is mild redundancy in the safety messaging and a few rhetorical asides that could be trimmed for token efficiency.
Suggestions
Consolidate the safety rules: the 'safety contract', Step 5's safe/needs-user/never tiers, and the notes repeat the same sudo/deletion prohibitions — state them once and cross-reference.
Trim motivational asides like 'the way a good technician would: look first, explain plainly, fix only with permission' and 'This is the part that makes users trust the skill'; the contract bullets already convey the rules.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and purposeful — a scoring table, an exact report template, and terse per-step guidance — but there are trimmable elements: safety rules are restated across the 'safety contract', Step 5's tier lists, and the notes ('Never' appears twice), and a few rhetorical asides ('the way a good technician would…', 'This is the part that makes users trust the skill') earn no guidance value. This fits the 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' anchor, one notch below the lean-every-token-counts level. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: a copy-paste report template with exact line structure, a numeric scoring rubric with thresholds ('>20% free', '18 per 🔴'), named cleanup commands ('brew cleanup', 'npm cache clean', 'apt-get clean'), and per-OS batched collection scripts in the reference files (verified present and runnable, e.g. the macOS zsh batch with labeled sections). It matches the 'copy-paste ready, covers common cases' top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five steps are explicitly sequenced with an OS-discovery decision point, error tolerance ('If a single command errors… continue — partial data is fine'), per-action approval gates for cleanups, and a post-cleanup feedback loop ('Re-running Step 2's storage check afterward is a nice confirmation'). The destructive/batch-operation cap does not apply since validation and checkpoints are present; this matches the 'explicit validation steps; feedback loops' top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clean overview that defers platform specifics to three clearly signaled, one-level-deep references ('macOS → references/macos.md', etc., all verified to exist) and instructs reading only the matching one. Each reference file follows the same section structure (collection script, interpretation, optional checks, cleanup) with no further nesting, matching the top anchor exactly. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |