Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, action-oriented pipeline with strong sequencing, validation checkpoints, and clean progressive disclosure into real reference files. Conciseness and actionability are strong but not flawless due to some restated guidance and reliance on reference files for executable detail.
Suggestions
Consolidate the overlapping validation guidance between 验收 and 质量检查概要 into a single section to reduce restated content and tighten conciseness.
Inline the key structure_counts threshold values currently deferred to output-contract.md so Stage 6 completion can be judged without a second file load.
Trim the 投稿层拆解 sub-bullets, which duplicate concepts already covered by the analysis-short-* reference scales loaded later.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense, domain-specific prose that assumes competence and avoids explaining basics Claude already knows, but the 验收 / 质量检查概要 / 投稿层拆解 sections contain some restated guidance that could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance throughout — a stage table with explicit completion flags, a Stage→file mapping, a crash-safety write protocol, and numeric thresholds (≥4段, ≥5节点, ≥3层); as an instruction skill it lacks code, which is not penalized, but a few stages lean on reference files for the executable specifics. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Strictly sequenced 2→3→4→5→6 pipeline with per-stage completion gates, a resume/续跑 contract, and a three-checkpoint validation phase (表达自检, structure_counts 数值校验, [BLOCK] 项扫描) with explicit failure→retry feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a clear overview pointing to 19 real, one-level-deep reference files organized into 核心方法论 / 按需加载 / 补充资料 tables, each with a 'when to load' signal; verified references contain no nested references/ paths. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |